Bit counts where calculated for the current scamper run with the wider bit varation. The initial port value was not varied from trace to trace in original scamper and this is still the case. A random number is now used in the same range and a repeat scamper run is being carried out.
Debugging was carried out on the new confidence levels of scamper and it appears to be behaving as expected, apart from the results of the old vs new analysis. To help verify the correctness of the analysis packet counting was carried out to confirm the type of trace being analysed, and this did confirm that the correct traces were being analysed as having old and new confidence settings.
I then moved on to finding cases where the old <99% method found successors that the new 99% didn't find. There do some to be some anomalies associated with AS 174.
Further preparation of my talk was carried out.